Why firing squad

Convicted US killer requests death by firing squad. South Carolina to allow executions by firing squad. Utah approves death by firing squad. Image source, South Carolina Department of Corrections. Image source, Getty Images. Lawyers for the inmates argued that electrocution was cruel and unusual. How many countries still have the death penalty? Looking for answers in the life of a killer Last meals on death row. Only four US states allow executions by firing squad. Although each firing squad member must fire, one of the shooters usually receives a gun with a blank.

This ensures that no one in the group is able to know for sure which of them fired the fatal round. On several occasions, the condemned party has been hit by several bullets and lived.

When this happens, a final shooter dispatches the person at close range. Years ago, armies used firing squads to dispose of soldiers who performed traitorous acts or who refused to participate in the war effort.

Fact Sheet. Executions Methods of Execution Lethal injection is the most widely-used method of execution, but states still authorize other methods, including electrocution, gas chamber, hanging, and firing squad. Overview The primary means of execution in the U.

Military and U. Electrocution 8 states in South Carolina, electrocution is the primary method; the other 7 have lethal injection as primary method.

At oral argument, Alito laid the blame for tortured inmates at the feet of pharmaceutical companies that refused to be complicit in executions. The effective holding of Glossip , in other words, was that if death penalty opponents made it too difficult to execute people without causing them great pain, then states were free to torture people to death.

Then the Court went even further in Bucklew v. Precythe in States like South Carolina, in other words, can be fairly confident that the Supreme Court will bless their decision to revive methods of execution that have largely fallen out of favor with modern society. In , a death row inmate named Thomas Arthur brought a very unusual claim to the Supreme Court. Arthur was scheduled to be executed by the state of Alabama, and Alabama planned to kill him using a three-drug protocol that included a notoriously unreliable anesthetic.

He asked the Court to allow him to be killed by firing squad instead because he thought such a death would be less painful than the fate Alabama intended for him. Though the Court rejected this request in Arthur v. Dunn , Sotomayor once again dissented.

Just as significantly, Sotomayor indicted the entire process of using toxic drugs to kill people, because it sanitized the process of executions without rendering them any less cruel. A lethal injection can appear like a sterile medical procedure, where the person being executed seems to slip into a peaceful sleep.

Inmates executed by firing squad appear to be less likely to experience the prolonged agony faced by many people who are executed by lethal drugs.

And if South Carolina insists on killing people, it will be harder to ignore the enormity of what the state is doing.

Our mission has never been more vital than it is in this moment: to empower through understanding. Financial contributions from our readers are a critical part of supporting our resource-intensive work and help us keep our journalism free for all. Please consider making a contribution to Vox today to help us keep our work free for all.

Cookie banner We use cookies and other tracking technologies to improve your browsing experience on our site, show personalized content and targeted ads, analyze site traffic, and understand where our audiences come from.

By choosing I Accept , you consent to our use of cookies and other tracking technologies. Why firing squads are making a comeback in 21st-century America.